Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Cole County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 32
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Cole County, Missouri totaled $104,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Thomas B Loethen | Saint Thomas, MO 65076 | $30,370 |
2 | Stephen Joseph Suthoff | Saint Thomas, MO 65076 | $23,670 |
3 | James P Dalton Living Trust | Russellville, MO 65074 | $10,672 |
4 | Howard L And Carol A Woehrer Revocable Trust | Centertown, MO 65023 | $5,845 |
5 | Michael J Griffin | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $4,124 |
6 | Kerperin Farms LLC | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $3,411 |
7 | Randall J Deuschle | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $3,278 |
8 | Darren Matthews | Lohman, MO 65053 | $2,481 |
9 | Ralph H Popp | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $2,278 |
10 | Jerald Benne | Centertown, MO 65023 | $1,743 |
11 | Mike Bode | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $1,577 |
12 | Ralph C Kirchner | Lohman, MO 65053 | $1,367 |
13 | Joe Schroer | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $1,135 |
14 | Fredrick L Markway | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $1,133 |
15 | Arthur Hoelscher | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $1,104 |
16 | Joseph P Golden | Eugene, MO 65032 | $1,068 |
17 | Marvin Richter | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $970 |
18 | Delbert Hoelscher | Wardsville, MO 65101 | $783 |
19 | Jerry Kramp | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $700 |
20 | Randolph H Buschjost | Saint Thomas, MO 65076 | $683 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>