Production Flexibility Program in Dallas County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 53
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Dallas County, Missouri totaled $96,374 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Marty Miller | Long Lane, MO 65590 | $19,831 |
2 | James J Reser | Lincoln, MO 65338 | $13,109 |
3 | Margaret Hamlet | Louisburg, MO 65685 | $12,628 |
4 | Lueker Family Investment Inc | Buffalo, MO 65622 | $7,265 |
5 | Richard L Snider | Buffalo, MO 65622 | $5,993 |
6 | Gilbert Harrison Jr | Buffalo, MO 65622 | $4,310 |
7 | Loveta Brown | Long Lane, MO 65590 | $4,105 |
8 | Dallas Fletcher | Phillipsburg, MO 65722 | $4,097 |
9 | Frances Mae Kennedy | Half Way, MO 65663 | $2,015 |
10 | Larry Wayne Eagleburger | Buffalo, MO 65622 | $1,749 |
11 | Charles R Bolton | Laredo, TX 78041 | $1,708 |
12 | Kent Brown | Long Lane, MO 65590 | $1,491 |
13 | Stanley Ownby | Long Lane, MO 65590 | $1,486 |
14 | Lawrence Ethridge | Urbana, MO 65767 | $1,402 |
15 | Ronald D Melton | Buffalo, MO 65622 | $1,386 |
16 | Larimer Dairy Farms | Elkland, MO 65644 | $1,213 |
17 | Larry J Predmore | Buffalo, MO 65622 | $1,165 |
18 | Donna F Warren | Conway, MO 65632 | $1,038 |
19 | Edith Ownby | Buffalo, MO 65622 | $850 |
20 | Michael A Owen | Long Lane, MO 65590 | $847 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>