Farm Subsidy information
Dunklin County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Dunklin County, Missouri, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,334
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dunklin County, Missouri totaled $51,826,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Farm Credit Southeast Missouri ** | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $3,452,748 |
| 2 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $2,370,990 |
| 3 | First Missouri Bank Of Semo ** | Kennett, MO 63857 | $1,837,325 |
| 4 | Brown Brothers Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $1,219,537 |
| 5 | Parker & Jones Farms | Senath, MO 63876 | $794,425 |
| 6 | Layne Partnership | Arbyrd, MO 63821 | $793,417 |
| 7 | Bean Farms Partnership | Holcomb, MO 63852 | $736,704 |
| 8 | T And J Farms | Braggadocio, MO 63826 | $735,206 |
| 9 | Worrell Farms Partnership | Steele, MO 63877 | $662,727 |
| 10 | R&r Farms | Clarkton, MO 63837 | $643,220 |
| 11 | Senath State Bank ** | Senath, MO 63876 | $624,038 |
| 12 | Dsa Farms Gp | Clarkton, MO 63837 | $584,082 |
| 13 | J J Farms | Clarkton, MO 63837 | $575,456 |
| 14 | Harris Farms | Senath, MO 63876 | $567,624 |
| 15 | Donald E Masters Farms | Arbyrd, MO 63821 | $539,410 |
| 16 | First State Bank And Trust Branch ** | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $512,651 |
| 17 | Davault Arkmo Farms | Paragould, AR 72450 | $512,548 |
| 18 | Odle Planting Co | Senath, MO 63876 | $489,226 |
| 19 | 3 G Farms | Leachville, AR 72438 | $455,822 |
| 20 | Marty Vancil And Gentry Vancil | Campbell, MO 63933 | $429,630 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf