Production Flexibility Program in Gasconade County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 541
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Gasconade County, Missouri totaled $2,721,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Karl Reuben Kuschel | Chamois, MO 65024 | $90,111 |
2 | Dennis Lynn Fricke | Hermann, MO 65041 | $79,601 |
3 | Nicks Family Enterprises | Owensville, MO 65066 | $66,608 |
4 | Hesemann Farms Inc | Owensville, MO 65066 | $64,418 |
5 | Gary R Seifert | Morrison, MO 65061 | $57,028 |
6 | James R Krueger | Morrison, MO 65061 | $55,239 |
7 | Charles W Rost | Chamois, MO 65024 | $53,435 |
8 | Carl E Sassmann Rlt | Owensville, MO 65066 | $49,811 |
9 | David Ray Broeker | Morrison, MO 65061 | $47,751 |
10 | Jerry Roethemeyer | Owensville, MO 65066 | $46,276 |
11 | Edgar Brehe | Hermann, MO 65041 | $41,372 |
12 | Koelling Farms | Hermann, MO 65041 | $40,743 |
13 | Vernon F Steinbeck | Hermann, MO 65041 | $38,665 |
14 | Koelling Dairy | Hermann, MO 65041 | $32,922 |
15 | Betty J Eikermann | Gasconade, MO 65061 | $32,723 |
16 | John Steinbeck, Fritz Steinbeck, Lloyd Borcherding | Owensville, MO 65066 | $32,530 |
17 | Rohlfing Joint Revocable Living Trust | Hermann, MO 65041 | $31,372 |
18 | Kent Albert Kuschel | Chamois, MO 65024 | $29,825 |
19 | Russell Charles Hecker | Owensville, MO 65066 | $29,581 |
20 | Douglas Chris Schmitt | Morrison, MO 65061 | $28,709 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>