Farm Subsidy information
Harrison County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Harrison County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,921
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Harrison County, Missouri totaled $357,869,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dale Farming Company | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $10,754,616 |
2 | Willard D Darby | Bethany, MO 64424 | $2,949,104 |
3 | Gregory L Fenimore | Mc Fall, MO 64657 | $2,636,689 |
4 | Rose M Fenimore | Mc Fall, MO 64657 | $2,465,037 |
5 | Patricia S Darby | Bethany, MO 64424 | $2,211,423 |
6 | Sharon J Fenimore Revocable Trust | Bethany, MO 64424 | $1,973,552 |
7 | John Harvey Meek Trust | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $1,743,057 |
8 | M F & C Inc | Bethany, MO 64424 | $1,606,049 |
9 | Jack Fenimore | Bethany, MO 64424 | $1,533,613 |
10 | Claude Cox And Sons Inc | Bethany, MO 64424 | $1,496,458 |
11 | Richard L Fordyce | Bethany, MO 64424 | $1,439,320 |
12 | Bradley Alan Fenimore | Bethany, MO 64424 | $1,386,373 |
13 | Dale Brothers | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $1,327,085 |
14 | Ward Sperry Inc | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $1,316,497 |
15 | Carl Folgate | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $1,314,568 |
16 | Ronnie L Runyan Trust | Bethany, MO 64424 | $1,276,425 |
17 | J N Ward | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $1,259,999 |
18 | Oram Farms Inc | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $1,254,106 |
19 | Ronnie Musick | Bethany, MO 64424 | $1,220,184 |
20 | Leland Musick | Bethany, MO 64424 | $1,203,214 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>