Farm Subsidy information
Harrison County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Harrison County, Missouri, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,389
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Harrison County, Missouri totaled $30,073,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dale Farming Company | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $1,148,543 |
| 2 | Dale Brothers | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $560,993 |
| 3 | Patricia S Darby | Bethany, MO 64424 | $492,033 |
| 4 | Willard D Darby | Bethany, MO 64424 | $492,010 |
| 5 | M F & C Inc | Bethany, MO 64424 | $255,578 |
| 6 | John Harvey Meek Trust | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $235,829 |
| 7 | Gregory L Fenimore | Mc Fall, MO 64657 | $227,421 |
| 8 | Rose M Fenimore | Mc Fall, MO 64657 | $227,348 |
| 9 | Oram Brothers LLC | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $206,229 |
| 10 | Honey Creek Ranch LLC | Independence, MO 64056 | $205,568 |
| 11 | Harding Farms LLC | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $203,219 |
| 12 | Johnson Family Farm Inc | Cainsville, MO 64632 | $196,839 |
| 13 | Ryan Scott Klindt | Bethany, MO 64424 | $191,103 |
| 14 | Oram Farms Inc | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $188,023 |
| 15 | Troy Jennings | Gallatin, MO 64640 | $186,861 |
| 16 | Allan Mulnix Farms LLC | Bethany, MO 64424 | $182,526 |
| 17 | Bill Joe Reno | Eagleville, MO 64442 | $174,683 |
| 18 | Clearwater Inc | Albany, MO 64402 | $168,608 |
| 19 | Jeff Ward Farms Inc | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $167,669 |
| 20 | Prairie Vu Company LLC | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $166,216 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf