Farm Subsidy information
Howell County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Howell County, Missouri, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 104
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Howell County, Missouri totaled $427,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Collins Farming LLC | West Plains, MO 65775 | $77,392 |
| 2 | John W Phillips | Cabool, MO 65689 | $14,342 |
| 3 | Stewart Land And Cattle Co Inc | West Plains, MO 65775 | $11,743 |
| 4 | Morrison Dairy Cattle LLC | West Plains, MO 65775 | $10,404 |
| 5 | Charles Hart | West Plains, MO 65775 | $9,101 |
| 6 | Scott Riley | Caulfield, MO 65626 | $8,286 |
| 7 | Joe Mcclellan | Willow Springs, MO 65793 | $7,422 |
| 8 | Ronald D Foster | Bakersfield, MO 65609 | $6,626 |
| 9 | Philrite Inc | Koshkonong, MO 65692 | $6,574 |
| 10 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $5,918 |
| 11 | Darrell Tyree | West Plains, MO 65775 | $5,768 |
| 12 | Raymond Rasor | Peace Valley, MO 65788 | $5,729 |
| 13 | Marcus Scott Hoover | West Plains, MO 65775 | $5,184 |
| 14 | Don Proffitt | Pottersville, MO 65790 | $4,843 |
| 15 | Donald Nielsen | Pomona, MO 65789 | $4,745 |
| 16 | Brian Hoover | West Plains, MO 65775 | $4,064 |
| 17 | David Lee Foster Jr | Birch Tree, MO 65438 | $3,765 |
| 18 | Kenneth Foster | Caulfield, MO 65626 | $3,634 |
| 19 | Carl Beavers | Pottersville, MO 65790 | $3,504 |
| 20 | Donald Johnson | Koshkonong, MO 65692 | $3,481 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf