Conservation Reserve Program in Mississippi County, Missouri, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 85
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Mississippi County, Missouri totaled $309,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Beckwith Place LLC | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $28,417 |
| 2 | Sisters Island Partnership | Germantown, TN 38138 | $21,432 |
| 3 | John Carleton Moreton | Charleston, MO 63834 | $16,490 |
| 4 | Bryant Living Trust | Rogersville, MO 65742 | $15,031 |
| 5 | Lankheit Family Farms, Inc. | Charleston, MO 63834 | $13,823 |
| 6 | L Burke Dodson - Burke And Cherie Dodson Trust | Charleston, MO 63834 | $12,135 |
| 7 | Glen Ault Jr | Charleston, MO 63834 | $11,491 |
| 8 | Rushing River Farms LLC | Charleston, MO 63834 | $11,167 |
| 9 | Mary Ellen Weaver Trust | Shawnee, KS 66216 | $9,528 |
| 10 | Callahan Farms Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $8,078 |
| 11 | Bayou Du Chein LLC | North Palm Beach, FL 33408 | $8,038 |
| 12 | Sandra M Keck | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $7,097 |
| 13 | James Lee Haines | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $6,603 |
| 14 | Sunburst Plantation Inc | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $6,583 |
| 15 | Donald H Harper Sr Living Trust | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $6,575 |
| 16 | Shelby Land Co | Charleston, MO 63834 | $5,570 |
| 17 | J R Goodin Farms LLC | Bertrand, MO 63823 | $5,170 |
| 18 | The James Handy Moore Marital Trust Uad 5/27/97 | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $5,166 |
| 19 | Floyd Delbert Stallings-floyd D Stallings Living T | Charleston, MO 63834 | $4,513 |
| 20 | Jeffrey Byrne | Kansas City, MO 64108 | $4,406 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf