Farm Subsidy information
New Madrid County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in New Madrid County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,337
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in New Madrid County, Missouri totaled $681,472,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Missouri Delta Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $10,781,077 |
| 2 | Pearson Farms | Matthews, MO 63867 | $6,691,729 |
| 3 | Barry L Richardson Jr Farms | Marston, MO 63866 | $6,602,413 |
| 4 | Hoggard Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $6,429,837 |
| 5 | Parker Brothers Farm | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $6,429,025 |
| 6 | Southern Bank ** | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $5,614,536 |
| 7 | J & M Priggel Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $5,575,483 |
| 8 | Joe Woolverton Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $5,417,608 |
| 9 | Hayes Farm | Marston, MO 63866 | $4,422,812 |
| 10 | Larry Bradfield Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $4,236,610 |
| 11 | Jennings Planting Co | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $4,203,039 |
| 12 | Kimes Bros | Portageville, MO 63873 | $3,989,388 |
| 13 | Jason E Cope Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $3,566,312 |
| 14 | Larry Woolverton Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $3,509,615 |
| 15 | Donnie Underwood Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $3,408,786 |
| 16 | Alliance Bank ** | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $3,218,846 |
| 17 | Craig Hunter Farms | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $3,048,311 |
| 18 | Ronald A Kimes Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $2,918,770 |
| 19 | Tommy Lawfield Jr Farms | Catron, MO 63833 | $2,870,946 |
| 20 | Henry Brands & Sons Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $2,731,619 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf