Farm Subsidy information
Pemiscot County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Pemiscot County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,425
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pemiscot County, Missouri totaled $464,307,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Michael A Tidwell | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $2,341,291 |
22 | Pascola Gin And Supply | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $2,334,692 |
23 | Kara Woods Still | Steele, MO 63877 | $2,247,503 |
24 | David Bond Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $2,244,136 |
25 | David Haggard | Steele, MO 63877 | $2,171,715 |
26 | Gregory Wilson Duffy | Hayti, MO 63851 | $2,141,679 |
27 | W & D Wilkins Farms | Gideon, MO 63848 | $1,962,334 |
28 | O H Acom Farms Inc | Wardell, MO 63879 | $1,879,838 |
29 | Merideth Farms Inc | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $1,872,965 |
30 | Burton Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $1,871,519 |
31 | D-m-b Farms | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $1,848,307 |
32 | Randy Myron Bradford | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $1,833,549 |
33 | Lee Ann Raulerson | Holland, MO 63853 | $1,790,060 |
34 | Michael Bernard Farms | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $1,788,207 |
35 | Joe Tidwell Farms | Bragg City, MO 63827 | $1,786,485 |
36 | Danny Glass | Wardell, MO 63879 | $1,762,550 |
37 | Massey Farms Inc | Hayti, MO 63851 | $1,725,532 |
38 | Delbert Depriest | Steele, MO 63877 | $1,690,635 |
39 | Dolphin Land Co | Steele, MO 63877 | $1,678,048 |
40 | Kris Robinson Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $1,665,256 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”