Farm Subsidy information
Pettis County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Pettis County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,236
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pettis County, Missouri totaled $247,625,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Guier Family Farms | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $937,173 |
22 | Robert Kahrs Longan | Windsor, MO 65360 | $933,788 |
23 | Charles M Lazenby Trust | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $908,004 |
24 | Richard Rice Farms Inc | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $903,626 |
25 | Dean Guier Inc | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $894,472 |
26 | Scotten Farms Inc | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $877,907 |
27 | Roger James Twenter Jr | Pilot Grove, MO 65276 | $869,837 |
28 | Selken Farm LLC | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $857,787 |
29 | O-rich Dairy | Mora, MO 65345 | $855,829 |
30 | Susan S Callis | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $851,571 |
31 | Moses Yoder Jr | La Monte, MO 65337 | $816,054 |
32 | David Gerken | La Monte, MO 65337 | $812,116 |
33 | Laurence Ray Claycomb | Hughesville, MO 65334 | $807,361 |
34 | Tracy Dale Monsees | Smithton, MO 65350 | $805,101 |
35 | Robert E Thompson Rev Trust | La Monte, MO 65337 | $803,389 |
36 | Carl Eugene Arnett | La Monte, MO 65337 | $798,772 |
37 | Dennis Dale Dove | Windsor, MO 65360 | $784,945 |
38 | Jaeger & Gerke Farms | Smithton, MO 65350 | $768,654 |
39 | Dustin Lane Meyer | Houstonia, MO 65333 | $760,091 |
40 | Kenneth Dean Combs | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $694,959 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”