Farm Subsidy information

Pettis County, Missouri

Total Subsidies in Pettis County, Missouri, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,236

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pettis County, Missouri totaled $247,625,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2021
1Charles Edward HardyGreen Ridge, MO 65332$2,080,729
2South Fork Farms IncSweet Springs, MO 65351$2,009,635
3J C Ranch IncHughesville, MO 65334$1,970,027
4Richard HelmigOtterville, MO 65348$1,594,286
5Jones Bros Farms IncLa Monte, MO 65337$1,527,707
6Olipharm Inc C/o Wm R LemonsLa Monte, MO 65337$1,415,473
7Samuel DoveGreen Ridge, MO 65332$1,410,298
8Thomas R Parsons TylerSweet Springs, MO 65351$1,395,358
9Green Hill Farms LLCSmithton, MO 65350$1,295,188
10Randy Martin Farms IncLa Monte, MO 65337$1,171,303
11Williams Family Farms IncSedalia, MO 65301$1,164,165
12Mike KnausSedalia, MO 65301$1,156,128
13Meyer Farm IncSedalia, MO 65301$1,129,648
14Robert L Blackburn Revocable Living TrustHoustonia, MO 65333$1,049,611
15Williams Farm IncHughesville, MO 65334$1,047,618
16Bill Hamilton JrWindsor, MO 65360$1,042,666
17Double Bar R Cattle & Grain Company LLCHughesville, MO 65334$1,040,652
18William Nathan TaylorLa Monte, MO 65337$1,031,700
19Barry Guier Revocable Living TrusSweet Springs, MO 65351$1,020,821
20David W CallisSedalia, MO 65301$978,769

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag