Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Pettis County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 56
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Pettis County, Missouri totaled $521,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Charles Edward Hardy | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $46,020 |
2 | South Fork Farms Inc | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $36,564 |
3 | Carrol Dean Guier Revocable Trust | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $30,397 |
4 | Flat Creek Farms Of Pettis Co Inc | Parkville, MO 64152 | $28,176 |
5 | Green Hill Farms LLC | Smithton, MO 65350 | $26,460 |
6 | Deer Run Farms Of Sedalia LLC | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $26,160 |
7 | Wilfred Scott Purchase | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $21,563 |
8 | John M Chamberlin | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $20,693 |
9 | Chanticleer Ranch Inc | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $19,500 |
10 | Ester A Parker | Canton, TX 75103 | $19,406 |
11 | Albert A Reine Sr | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $16,680 |
12 | Russell Rayl | Smithton, MO 65350 | $15,414 |
13 | Michael Allen Moon | Ionia, MO 65335 | $15,000 |
14 | Betty Jane Billings | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $13,500 |
15 | Gary R Nelson | Smithton, MO 65350 | $12,938 |
16 | Thomas S Kreisel | Houstonia, MO 65333 | $12,885 |
17 | Kevin Eilks | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $12,262 |
18 | John T Rissler | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $12,090 |
19 | James Madison Mcmullin | La Monte, MO 65337 | $10,886 |
20 | James Stuart | Parkville, MO 64152 | $10,398 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>