Deficiency Payment in Pike County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 532
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Pike County, Missouri totaled $1,069,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pike Grain Co Inc | Louisiana, MO 63353 | $68,940 |
| 2 | Helen P Mackey 12/97 | Clarksville, MO 63336 | $19,874 |
| 3 | Tepen Brothers Inc | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $19,117 |
| 4 | Korte Farms | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $17,332 |
| 5 | Thomas Gregory & Sons | Eolia, MO 63344 | $16,340 |
| 6 | Francis Marion Mackey III | Clarksville, MO 63336 | $15,464 |
| 7 | Wells Liv Rev Trust | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $15,089 |
| 8 | James Edward Hubert | Curryville, MO 63339 | $14,277 |
| 9 | Nolan Miller | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $14,118 |
| 10 | Young Enterprises Inc | New Hartford, MO 63359 | $12,912 |
| 11 | K D Brooksher | Elsberry, MO 63343 | $11,808 |
| 12 | Alvin Franklin Adams Jr | Eolia, MO 63344 | $10,966 |
| 13 | Gerald O Merz | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $10,283 |
| 14 | Leon L Chapuis | Louisiana, MO 63353 | $9,416 |
| 15 | Jimmie Lee Adams | Frankford, MO 63441 | $9,080 |
| 16 | Joseph Herman Grote | Curryville, MO 63339 | $8,944 |
| 17 | Wyble Land And Cattle Co LLC | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $8,869 |
| 18 | Rosie Lee Adams | Eolia, MO 63344 | $8,817 |
| 19 | Karl F Dewey Jr | Louisiana, MO 63353 | $8,734 |
| 20 | Scherder Bros | New Hartford, MO 63359 | $8,622 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf