Production Flexibility Program in Putnam County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 555
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Putnam County, Missouri totaled $4,559,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | William And Lois Fleshman Trust | Unionville, MO 63565 | $130,854 |
2 | M H Cooley | Unionville, MO 63565 | $109,671 |
3 | Cooley Farm Service Inc | Lucerne, MO 64655 | $108,578 |
4 | Louis Lutz Inc | Powersville, MO 64672 | $103,755 |
5 | Nor-del Farms Inc | Lucerne, MO 64655 | $93,695 |
6 | Jack R Cooley And Dixie L Cooley | Lucerne, MO 64655 | $86,181 |
7 | John Brown | Livonia, MO 63551 | $76,726 |
8 | Robert Ray | Unionville, MO 63565 | $74,383 |
9 | Thomas Charles Klingner | Unionville, MO 63565 | $73,298 |
10 | Carl E Jones | Unionville, MO 63565 | $66,543 |
11 | Phil Fleshman | Unionville, MO 63565 | $64,424 |
12 | Philip Vanbuskirk | Lucerne, MO 64655 | $58,952 |
13 | Robert Ray Jr | Unionville, MO 63565 | $53,219 |
14 | Jim Rakestraw | Plattsburg, MO 64477 | $51,324 |
15 | Gillum Ranch Inc Dba Roymar Limit | Unionville, MO 63565 | $50,510 |
16 | El-co Contractors Inc | Powersville, MO 64672 | $50,394 |
17 | Charles L Oreilly | Powersville, MO 64672 | $49,468 |
18 | Jack Guffey | Powersville, MO 64672 | $42,524 |
19 | Bradley Gillum | Green Castle, MO 63544 | $41,359 |
20 | James C Davis | Powersville, MO 64672 | $40,916 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>