Farm Subsidy information
Saint Charles County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Saint Charles County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 713
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Saint Charles County, Missouri totaled $6,493,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Weber Bros | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $31,044 |
| 22 | Gregory William Wehmeyer | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $29,553 |
| 23 | Cletus Kampmann Jr | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $28,929 |
| 24 | Larry E Brunstein | West Alton, MO 63386 | $28,544 |
| 25 | Semke Farming LLC | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $28,287 |
| 26 | Boerding Farm LLC | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $27,572 |
| 27 | Becker Farms Inc | Augusta, MO 63332 | $26,946 |
| 28 | Samuel Boerding | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $26,476 |
| 29 | Ray & Gary Machens Farms Inc | West Alton, MO 63386 | $24,719 |
| 30 | Steinhoff Bros Inc | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $24,300 |
| 31 | Michael V Broeker | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $23,671 |
| 32 | D & D Wappelhorst Farm, LLC | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $23,517 |
| 33 | Wiesehan Grain Farms, LLC | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $22,686 |
| 34 | R&b Feise Farms LLC | Ofallon, MO 63366 | $22,103 |
| 35 | Precision Farms LLC | Liberty, IL 62347 | $21,812 |
| 36 | A.g.a. Farms, LLC | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $20,880 |
| 37 | Requat Family Farms, Lp | Wright City, MO 63390 | $20,238 |
| 38 | B & B Farms And Excavating LLC | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $19,681 |
| 39 | Matthew Edward Neustadt | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $19,532 |
| 40 | Richard Dove | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $19,460 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf