Farm Subsidy information
Scotland County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Scotland County, Missouri, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 718
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Scotland County, Missouri totaled $13,443,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ruth Farms, LLC | Downing, MO 63536 | $349,683 |
| 2 | Brewer Family Farms, LLC | Memphis, MO 63555 | $327,377 |
| 3 | Triplett Brothers Farms, L.l.c. | Rutledge, MO 63563 | $291,215 |
| 4 | Patrick Ian Hines | Memphis, MO 63555 | $233,867 |
| 5 | Lester Lane Hines | Memphis, MO 63555 | $215,967 |
| 6 | Jerad M Fuller | Memphis, MO 63555 | $213,757 |
| 7 | Justin Troy Fuller | Memphis, MO 63555 | $163,059 |
| 8 | Trent Christian Shultz | Rutledge, MO 63563 | $148,683 |
| 9 | Steven Lynn Morris | Memphis, MO 63555 | $147,352 |
| 10 | James Floyd Baker | Memphis, MO 63555 | $142,692 |
| 11 | Dana Sue Hauk | Memphis, MO 63555 | $142,652 |
| 12 | Kenneth Olin Hauk Jr | Memphis, MO 63555 | $134,939 |
| 13 | Mark William Monroe | Memphis, MO 63555 | $125,232 |
| 14 | Steve Lee Shoop | Moravia, IA 52571 | $119,697 |
| 15 | Edward Zimmerman Good | Memphis, MO 63555 | $106,186 |
| 16 | Randall Dale Mauck | Memphis, MO 63555 | $92,768 |
| 17 | David Edwin Kirkpatrick | Memphis, MO 63555 | $92,158 |
| 18 | K Brent Rockhold | Arbela, MO 63432 | $91,555 |
| 19 | John Douglas Aylward Jr | Memphis, MO 63555 | $89,205 |
| 20 | Christy Joy Aylward | Memphis, MO 63555 | $89,205 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf