Farm Subsidy information
Scott County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Scott County, Missouri, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 812
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Scott County, Missouri totaled $20,724,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Alliance Bank ** | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,105,317 |
2 | Farm Credit Southeast Missouri ** | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $698,678 |
3 | Triple B Partnership | Oran, MO 63771 | $580,225 |
4 | Montgomery Bank ** | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $443,426 |
5 | Priggel Land Partnership | Oran, MO 63771 | $387,293 |
6 | First State Bank And Trust Branch ** | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $368,436 |
7 | Seiler Farms Inc | Benton, MO 63736 | $365,470 |
8 | Patrick Hulshof Farms | Benton, MO 63736 | $331,209 |
9 | Focus Bank ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $298,168 |
10 | Seyer Farms | Oran, MO 63771 | $285,297 |
11 | Ridgetop Farms LLC | Scott City, MO 63780 | $281,238 |
12 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $254,338 |
13 | Legrand Farm Co | Benton, MO 63736 | $229,320 |
14 | Mark A And Connie S Siebert - Siebert Farms | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $226,269 |
15 | Legrand Brothers | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $222,224 |
16 | Essner Brothers Farms | Benton, MO 63736 | $221,294 |
17 | Steven Allen Minner | Morley, MO 63767 | $220,376 |
18 | Gage Farms | Scott City, MO 63780 | $216,399 |
19 | David Bollinger | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $206,042 |
20 | Schwartz Brothers Inc | Scott City, MO 63780 | $199,746 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>