Farm Subsidy information
Scott County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Scott County, Missouri, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 839
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Scott County, Missouri totaled $22,855,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Steve Minner Farms | Oran, MO 63771 | $107,607 |
42 | E & L Farms Partnership | Oran, MO 63771 | $107,516 |
43 | T & R Farms LLC | Scott City, MO 63780 | $104,555 |
44 | Heartland Application And Equipment Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $102,368 |
45 | Riche La Terre Land Partnership L P | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $99,169 |
46 | Gabriel P Scherer | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $98,691 |
47 | Ken Westrich Farms LLC | Scott City, MO 63780 | $98,668 |
48 | Vincent Hulshof | Benton, MO 63736 | $98,246 |
49 | Tony Johnson | Vanduser, MO 63784 | $94,306 |
50 | Focus Bank ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $88,864 |
51 | Gilpin Farms Llp | Scott City, MO 63780 | $86,995 |
52 | Randy Albert Enderle | Oran, MO 63771 | $84,502 |
53 | Burger Farms & Ranches LLC | Scott City, MO 63780 | $84,368 |
54 | Heisserer Farms | Scott City, MO 63780 | $83,690 |
55 | Parker Brothers Farm | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $80,378 |
56 | Urhahn Farms | Benton, MO 63736 | $79,030 |
57 | Beggs Melon Co Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $76,449 |
58 | Burger Planting Co | Oran, MO 63771 | $76,377 |
59 | First State Bank And Trust Branch ** | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $75,539 |
60 | Douglas Gosche | Oran, MO 63771 | $75,293 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”