Total Disaster Programs in Stoddard County, Missouri, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 52
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Stoddard County, Missouri totaled $480,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bell Family Partnership | Van Buren, MO 63965 | $41,644 |
| 2 | Triple Bg Partnership | Bell City, MO 63735 | $39,045 |
| 3 | Bell Planting Company | Bell City, MO 63735 | $32,766 |
| 4 | Cleatus Glenn Lemmons Jr | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $24,568 |
| 5 | Nebco Inc | Bell City, MO 63735 | $23,519 |
| 6 | Ccg Farms Incorporated | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $22,492 |
| 7 | James R Burnett | Advance, MO 63730 | $19,396 |
| 8 | Eric Boyer | Dexter, MO 63841 | $18,519 |
| 9 | Michael Allen Yeakey | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $17,732 |
| 10 | James Mark Kelley | Essex, MO 63846 | $17,021 |
| 11 | James Ross Kelley | Essex, MO 63846 | $15,632 |
| 12 | Seepwater Farms Inc | Bell City, MO 63735 | $14,890 |
| 13 | Donna Deardorff | Dudley, MO 63936 | $12,765 |
| 14 | Gary Deardorff | Dudley, MO 63936 | $12,764 |
| 15 | Patrick Douglas Hobbs | Dudley, MO 63936 | $11,777 |
| 16 | August Anthony Thorn | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $10,961 |
| 17 | Mph Fleeman Farms | Puxico, MO 63960 | $9,900 |
| 18 | Bobby Howell Aycock Jr | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $8,642 |
| 19 | Julie L Aycock | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $8,641 |
| 20 | Gary Lee Hobbs | Dudley, MO 63936 | $8,322 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf