Emergency Conservation Program in Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,586
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Montana totaled $38,994,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Browning Partnership | Winnett, MT 59087 | $392,639 |
| 2 | Chippewa Cree Tribe | Box Elder, MT 59521 | $262,770 |
| 3 | L O Cattle Company | Sand Springs, MT 59077 | $254,629 |
| 4 | Bill Harris | Winnett, MT 59087 | $243,528 |
| 5 | Occ-o'connor Crops & Cattle LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $197,136 |
| 6 | Padlock Ranch Co | Ranchester, WY 82839 | $188,919 |
| 7 | Newman Ayers Ranch Inc | Ismay, MT 59336 | $188,857 |
| 8 | Iou Ranch | Sand Springs, MT 59077 | $186,172 |
| 9 | Northern Cheyenne Tribe | Lame Deer, MT 59043 | $184,950 |
| 10 | David Stinson | Volborg, MT 59351 | $181,879 |
| 11 | Mcgill Land & Livestock Inc | Powderville, MT 59345 | $168,211 |
| 12 | Booth Land & Livestock | Lucerne, CO 80646 | $160,166 |
| 13 | Clear Creek Livestock Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $150,224 |
| 14 | William D Doman | Winnett, MT 59087 | $149,952 |
| 15 | Calf Creek Cattle Company LLC | Sand Springs, MT 59077 | $141,848 |
| 16 | Lewis John Krutzfeldt | Powderville, MT 59345 | $134,175 |
| 17 | Brown & Brown Of Mt Inc | Park City, UT 84060 | $129,725 |
| 18 | Terrett Ranch Co | Miles City, MT 59301 | $129,562 |
| 19 | Mitch Roen | Musselshell, MT 59059 | $118,068 |
| 20 | Parrot Creek, LLC | Bozeman, MT 59718 | $116,741 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf