Farm Subsidy information
Montana
Total Subsidies in Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 60,461
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Montana totaled $9,989,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jsks Pattison Ptnrshp | Havre, MT 59501 | $4,730,242 |
22 | Neufeld Farms Partnership | Larslan, MT 59244 | $4,673,997 |
23 | Fort Belknap Indian Comm | Harlem, MT 59526 | $4,614,680 |
24 | Becker Farming | Billings, MT 59101 | $4,580,911 |
25 | Schuler Bros | Carter, MT 59420 | $4,510,348 |
26 | Neil Johnson Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $4,505,511 |
27 | Singleton Farms | Miles City, MT 59301 | $4,309,649 |
28 | Fort Peck Tribes | Poplar, MT 59255 | $4,266,176 |
29 | Ralph Johnson Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $4,251,656 |
30 | M & M Farms | Shelby, MT 59474 | $4,219,747 |
31 | Springwater Colony Inc | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $4,177,266 |
32 | Larry J & Gene C Billmayer Ptr | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $4,107,005 |
33 | H & H Farming | Miles City, MT 59301 | $4,085,140 |
34 | Hadford Farm Partnership | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $3,988,590 |
35 | K B Farming | Conrad, MT 59425 | $3,980,795 |
36 | Tranel Ranch | Billings, MT 59106 | $3,954,454 |
37 | Big Sky Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $3,930,127 |
38 | Williams Brothers | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $3,916,088 |
39 | Cybulski Brothers | Custer, MT 59024 | $3,860,003 |
40 | Nessan Brothers Ag | Billings, MT 59102 | $3,831,680 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”