Total Disaster Programs in Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 30,903
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Montana totaled $1,146,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Patterson Land & Livestock Co | Custer, MT 59024 | $852,933 |
22 | Montgomery Ranch Co | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $837,413 |
23 | S Farms | Miles City, MT 59301 | $836,358 |
24 | Fredrick D Wacker And Gwendolyn K Wacker Dba Cross | Miles City, MT 59301 | $824,679 |
25 | U Hanging Seven Ranch Inc | Baker, MT 59313 | $820,328 |
26 | Singleton Farms | Miles City, MT 59301 | $809,301 |
27 | Schiffer Ranch Co | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $800,503 |
28 | Debuff Enterprises | Shawmut, MT 59078 | $799,966 |
29 | Flat Willow Ranch | Roundup, MT 59072 | $798,797 |
30 | Lewis John Krutzfeldt | Powderville, MT 59345 | $791,262 |
31 | Gordon Cattle Company | Chinook, MT 59523 | $789,452 |
32 | Salmond Ranch Company | Choteau, MT 59422 | $780,439 |
33 | 40 Mile Colony Ranch Inc | Lodge Grass, MT 59050 | $773,675 |
34 | Griffin Ranch Co | Ismay, MT 59336 | $767,447 |
35 | S Ranch LLC | Custer, MT 59024 | $766,449 |
36 | Huntsman Ranch Co | Dell, MT 59724 | $762,939 |
37 | Spring Coulee Land & Cattle | Highwood, MT 59450 | $742,168 |
38 | Thomas Ranch Inc | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $740,520 |
39 | Walborn Cattle Co | Hardin, MT 59034 | $724,930 |
40 | Karen Krutzfeldt | Powderville, MT 59345 | $723,811 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”