Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Montana, 2019

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 9,875

Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Montana totaled $69,644,000 in in 2019.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC)
2019
1Stockman Bank **Conrad, MT 59425$4,627,162
2Northwest Farm Credit Service **Great Falls, MT 59405$2,671,022
3Independence Bank **Havre, MT 59501$2,657,538
4First Security Bank **Roundup, MT 59072$1,292,263
5Opportunity Bank Of Montana **Dutton, MT 59433$603,604
6First Community Bank **Glasgow, MT 59230$502,690
7Glacier Bank **Choteau, MT 59422$492,025
8Dept Of Natural Resources & Conservation Trust LanHelena, MT 59620$475,924
9Rocky Mountain Bank **Plentywood, MT 59254$456,749
10Farm Services Agency **Washington, DC 20250$425,760
11Mccone County Federal Credit UnioCircle, MT 59215$365,682
12First Interstate Bank **Fairfield, WA 99012$363,944
13First State Bank Of Shelby **Shelby, MT 59474$301,781
14Bank Of Bridger **Plentywood, MT 59254$295,798
15American Bank Center **Dickinson, ND 58601$237,843
16Three B Farms PartnershipGettysburg, SD 57442$236,596
17Daniels-sheridan Federal Credit UnionScobey, MT 59263$140,734
18O'hara Land & CattleFort Benton, MT 59442$131,873
19Patriot FarmsBillings, MT 59107$129,095
20Krd FarmsFort Benton, MT 59442$127,432

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag