Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Beaverhead County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 84
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Beaverhead County, Montana totaled $2,810,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mallon Ranch Co | Dillon, MT 59725 | $24,024 |
22 | Gerald Jones | Dillon, MT 59725 | $22,438 |
23 | Dallaserra Ranches | Dillon, MT 59725 | $20,092 |
24 | Hansen Livestock | Dillon, MT 59725 | $19,810 |
25 | Chad Hansen | Dell, MT 59724 | $19,478 |
26 | Lee Martinell Co | Dell, MT 59724 | $18,259 |
27 | Point Of Rocks Angus Ranch Inc | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $14,476 |
28 | Andrew C Johnson | Dillon, MT 59725 | $14,344 |
29 | Phil Taylor | Dillon, MT 59725 | $13,506 |
30 | Sage Bluff Ranch LLC | Dillon, MT 59725 | $13,360 |
31 | Raffety Cattle Co | Dillon, MT 59725 | $12,841 |
32 | Rgb Farms, LLC | Dillon, MT 59725 | $12,668 |
33 | Hagenbarth Livestock | Glen, MT 59732 | $11,914 |
34 | Alan B Jenne | Dillon, MT 59725 | $9,774 |
35 | Jerry Meine | Dillon, MT 59725 | $9,332 |
36 | Kristi G Pancost | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $8,103 |
37 | Larry J Pancost | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $8,103 |
38 | Mike Probst | Dillon, MT 59725 | $7,911 |
39 | Spudz Inc | Dell, MT 59724 | $7,868 |
40 | Giem Ranches Inc | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $7,276 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”