Farm Subsidy information
Big Horn County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Big Horn County, Montana, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 437
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Big Horn County, Montana totaled $17,981,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | S Ranch LLC | Custer, MT 59024 | $1,100,457 |
| 2 | 40 Mile Colony Ranch Inc | Lodge Grass, MT 59050 | $411,077 |
| 3 | Proud Farms Inc | Hardin, MT 59034 | $345,231 |
| 4 | Stockman Bank ** | Conrad, MT 59425 | $306,302 |
| 5 | Patriot Farms | Billings, MT 59107 | $302,333 |
| 6 | Three B Farms Partnership | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $289,973 |
| 7 | Peritsa Creek Farms Inc | Hardin, MT 59034 | $262,928 |
| 8 | Peggy Fredericks | Busby, MT 59016 | $246,031 |
| 9 | Reuben Busenitz | Busby, MT 59016 | $202,824 |
| 10 | Cody Schwend | Saint Xavier, MT 59075 | $194,926 |
| 11 | Dorn Farms Inc | Hardin, MT 59034 | $192,453 |
| 12 | Nedens Farms Inc | Hardin, MT 59034 | $190,601 |
| 13 | Ellen T Allen | Custer, MT 59024 | $186,964 |
| 14 | James W Guercio | Boulder, CO 80303 | $182,637 |
| 15 | Walborn Cattle Co | Hardin, MT 59034 | $179,048 |
| 16 | Richard Lee Kehler Jr | Saint Xavier, MT 59075 | $177,375 |
| 17 | Grapevine Ranch Inc | Billings, MT 59103 | $173,536 |
| 18 | Woody Creek Cattle And Grain | Hardin, MT 59034 | $172,029 |
| 19 | Nessan Brothers Ag | Billings, MT 59102 | $167,903 |
| 20 | Sioux Pass Livestock And Grain | Lodge Grass, MT 59050 | $160,977 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf