Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Blaine County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 379
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Blaine County, Montana totaled $5,572,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | North Harlem Hutterian Brethren Inc | Harlem, MT 59526 | $265,705 |
2 | Hartland Colony Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $241,421 |
3 | 3x Farms | Chinook, MT 59523 | $203,644 |
4 | Turner Hutterian Brethren Inc | Turner, MT 59542 | $108,047 |
5 | David G Kirkaldie | Dodson, MT 59524 | $84,019 |
6 | R L Lankford Farms Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $78,888 |
7 | Fred Mohar Jr | Turner, MT 59542 | $77,136 |
8 | Sylvia Mohar | Turner, MT 59542 | $77,135 |
9 | Krass Farms Inc | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $77,104 |
10 | Larry J & Gene C Billmayer Ptr | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $75,520 |
11 | Triple K Farms Ptr | Harlem, MT 59526 | $71,500 |
12 | G & S Partners | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $70,971 |
13 | Nicholson Grain Farms | Chinook, MT 59523 | $70,533 |
14 | Tlc Farms Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $69,922 |
15 | Cherry Ridge Farms Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $67,435 |
16 | B & V Tilleman Farms | Chinook, MT 59523 | $66,362 |
17 | S & B Beck Farms Inc | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $66,229 |
18 | Grabofsky Livestock & Grain Inc | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $64,983 |
19 | Hinebauch Grain Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $64,637 |
20 | Northwest Farm Credit Service ** | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $64,086 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>