Total Disaster Programs in Carter County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 675
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Carter County, Montana totaled $45,838,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 6 Creeks Farm | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $1,330,846 |
2 | Thomas Ranch Inc | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $740,520 |
3 | Arledge Livestock Company LLC | Robert Lee, TX 76945 | $711,579 |
4 | Ronda K Cordell | Camp Crook, SD 57724 | $687,335 |
5 | Lee Labree | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $653,842 |
6 | Wolff Ranch Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $646,497 |
7 | Tim Mcinerney | Alzada, MT 59311 | $628,375 |
8 | F & R Ranches Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $586,041 |
9 | Cross W Livestock LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $559,612 |
10 | S & L Sheep Ranch Inc | Alzada, MT 59311 | $548,519 |
11 | Steve Stoddard | Broadus, MT 59317 | $533,869 |
12 | Harmon Creek Cattle LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $483,310 |
13 | Tooke Ranch Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $462,086 |
14 | Pilster Ranch Corp | Alzada, MT 59311 | $447,252 |
15 | Kenneth Talcott Inc | Hammond, MT 59332 | $421,413 |
16 | Occ-o'connor Crops & Cattle LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $421,174 |
17 | Keith Ranch Co | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $402,541 |
18 | Markuson Ranch | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $398,967 |
19 | Courtney Herefords | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $390,065 |
20 | Doran Higgins | Hammond, MT 59332 | $378,476 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>