Total Commodity Programs in Carter County, Montana, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 249
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Carter County, Montana totaled $11,089,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cross W Livestock LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $483,349 |
| 2 | 6 Creeks Farm | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $414,623 |
| 3 | Mccabe Enterprises LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $278,991 |
| 4 | Steve Stoddard | Broadus, MT 59317 | $247,210 |
| 5 | Capitol LLC | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $217,064 |
| 6 | Thomas Ranch Inc | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $202,398 |
| 7 | Wwf Livestock | Alzada, MT 59311 | $137,710 |
| 8 | Four Star Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $133,384 |
| 9 | Courtney Herefords | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $132,866 |
| 10 | Castleberry Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $132,060 |
| 11 | Alkali Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $129,746 |
| 12 | Pilster Ranch Corp | Alzada, MT 59311 | $125,914 |
| 13 | Jason King | Hammond, MT 59332 | $123,790 |
| 14 | Greg Williams Ranch Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $122,849 |
| 15 | Northwest Farm Credit Service ** | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $122,526 |
| 16 | Cassidy Jesperson | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $119,023 |
| 17 | Loehding Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $115,274 |
| 18 | Mcginnis Llp Of Nd | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $109,746 |
| 19 | Maureen Nixon | Alzada, MT 59311 | $108,095 |
| 20 | Semont LLC | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $107,998 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf