Farm Subsidy information
Cascade County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Cascade County, Montana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 648
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cascade County, Montana totaled $10,214,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Northwest Farm Credit Service ** | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $265,640 |
| 2 | Big Stone Colony Inc | Sand Coulee, MT 59472 | $261,015 |
| 3 | Hill Top Colony Inc | Stockett, MT 59480 | $224,874 |
| 4 | Bowman Ranch Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $198,582 |
| 5 | Hillcrest Colony Inc | Power, MT 59468 | $192,798 |
| 6 | Fairhaven Colony Inc | Ulm, MT 59485 | $190,391 |
| 7 | Pleasant Valley Colony | Belt, MT 59412 | $189,652 |
| 8 | Stockman Bank ** | Conrad, MT 59425 | $172,219 |
| 9 | Standley Brothers Partnership | Cascade, MT 59421 | $169,245 |
| 10 | Grass Land Colony Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $149,647 |
| 11 | Shaw Butte Farms Inc | Sun River, MT 59483 | $147,236 |
| 12 | Sun Land Farm Inc | Ulm, MT 59485 | $137,221 |
| 13 | Huber Ranch | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $133,676 |
| 14 | Epic Partners | Sun River, MT 59483 | $125,603 |
| 15 | Countryhome Colony Inc | Ulm, MT 59485 | $114,955 |
| 16 | Sheffels Farms Inc | Great Falls, MT 59403 | $112,669 |
| 17 | Area 59 | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $110,988 |
| 18 | Wade W Jacobsen | Sun River, MT 59483 | $98,994 |
| 19 | Taft Land Partnership | Cascade, MT 59421 | $93,727 |
| 20 | Bumgarner Ranch | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $87,833 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf