Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Cascade County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 888
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Cascade County, Montana totaled $26,033,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Huber Ranch | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $772,306 |
| 2 | Bowman Ranch Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $558,403 |
| 3 | Sheffels Farms Inc | Great Falls, MT 59403 | $553,676 |
| 4 | Fairhaven Colony Inc | Ulm, MT 59485 | $527,687 |
| 5 | Pleasant Valley Colony | Belt, MT 59412 | $496,581 |
| 6 | Stockman Bank ** | Conrad, MT 59425 | $473,091 |
| 7 | Sweeney Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $472,114 |
| 8 | Epic Partners | Sun River, MT 59483 | $470,223 |
| 9 | Hill Top Colony Inc | Stockett, MT 59480 | $461,445 |
| 10 | Countryhome Colony Inc | Ulm, MT 59485 | $427,706 |
| 11 | L Johnson Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $425,526 |
| 12 | Sun River Farm Inc | Ulm, MT 59485 | $387,695 |
| 13 | Andersen-hovland Ranch Inc | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $374,135 |
| 14 | Jeff Campbell | Floweree, MT 59440 | $368,847 |
| 15 | 4r Ventures | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $367,804 |
| 16 | Gary's Farms Inc | Power, MT 59468 | $357,960 |
| 17 | Area 59 | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $354,427 |
| 18 | Hillcrest Colony Inc | Power, MT 59468 | $351,134 |
| 19 | Carl Robert Mehmke | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $345,271 |
| 20 | Taft Land Partnership | Cascade, MT 59421 | $340,255 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf