Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Cascade County, Montana, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 612
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Cascade County, Montana totaled $6,447,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stockman Bank ** | Conrad, MT 59425 | $207,573 |
| 2 | Area 59 | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $192,431 |
| 3 | Huber Ranch | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $163,833 |
| 4 | Sweeney Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $117,790 |
| 5 | Jeffrey S Olson | Cascade, MT 59421 | $117,626 |
| 6 | Bowman Ranch Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $117,625 |
| 7 | Fairhaven Colony Inc | Ulm, MT 59485 | $117,625 |
| 8 | Hill Top Colony Inc | Stockett, MT 59480 | $117,625 |
| 9 | Big Stone Colony Inc | Sand Coulee, MT 59472 | $117,622 |
| 10 | Sheffels Farms Inc | Great Falls, MT 59403 | $113,979 |
| 11 | Pleasant Valley Colony | Belt, MT 59412 | $112,976 |
| 12 | Northwest Farm Credit Service ** | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $112,703 |
| 13 | C & C Farms | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $110,655 |
| 14 | Montana Prairie Nest II | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $105,606 |
| 15 | Opportunity Bank Of Montana ** | Dutton, MT 59433 | $101,428 |
| 16 | Bumgarner Ranch | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $98,817 |
| 17 | 4r Ventures | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $98,713 |
| 18 | Shaw Butte Farms Inc | Sun River, MT 59483 | $95,529 |
| 19 | L Johnson Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $95,295 |
| 20 | Sun Land Farm Inc | Ulm, MT 59485 | $95,124 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf