Miscellaneous Disaster Programs in Chouteau County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 289
Recipients of Miscellaneous Disaster Programs from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $1,620,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rolling Acres Farm Inc | Brady, MT 59416 | $67,487 |
| 2 | Lonesome Dove Grain Co & Schulen | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $62,136 |
| 3 | Bj & Cj Farming | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $61,364 |
| 4 | Krd Farms | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $59,782 |
| 5 | Bcd Macdonald Inc | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $38,077 |
| 6 | Beaverslide Ventures | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $34,640 |
| 7 | Hollandsworth Grain Inc | Brady, MT 59416 | $29,301 |
| 8 | Urton Acres Inc | Vida, MT 59274 | $29,000 |
| 9 | Killion Farms Inc | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $28,149 |
| 10 | Diana Knudson | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $25,847 |
| 11 | Russ Knudson | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $25,844 |
| 12 | Ronald R Pegar | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $23,071 |
| 13 | Glen Nepil Farms Inc | Miles City, MT 59301 | $22,238 |
| 14 | Cliff Nepil Farms Inc | Crawford, MS 39743 | $22,238 |
| 15 | Gollehon Farming | Brady, MT 59416 | $21,931 |
| 16 | Bartell Farms Inc | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $21,498 |
| 17 | Gordon A Mckerrow | Floweree, MT 59440 | $21,045 |
| 18 | Lenington Farms | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $20,690 |
| 19 | Royce E Applegate | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $20,376 |
| 20 | Kerlan Co | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $20,113 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf