Farm Subsidy information

Chouteau County, Montana

Total Subsidies in Chouteau County, Montana, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,230

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $879,819,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2021
1Dnrc Trust Land Management - ExemHelena, MT 59620$8,051,568
2Krd FarmsFort Benton, MT 59442$5,784,051
3O'hara Land & CattleFort Benton, MT 59442$5,075,668
4Cgw FarmsFort Benton, MT 59442$4,968,018
5Williams BrothersBig Sandy, MT 59520$3,916,088
6Robert C & Kenneth C YirsaBig Sandy, MT 59520$3,518,544
7Worrall Brothers Farm PartnershipLoma, MT 59460$3,131,319
8Schuler BrosCarter, MT 59420$3,050,854
9Twin Hills Colony IncCarter, MT 59420$2,959,192
10Andreasen Lenington PartnershipFort Benton, MT 59442$2,796,656
11Stewart Ranch IncFort Benton, MT 59442$2,783,427
12Spring Coulee Land & CattleHighwood, MT 59450$2,743,177
13Square Butte Farms IncGeraldine, MT 59446$2,673,806
14Glacier Bank **Choteau, MT 59422$2,574,285
15Northwest Farm Credit Service **Great Falls, MT 59405$2,568,858
16B & M LundFort Benton, MT 59442$2,551,171
17Virgelle Ventures IncLoma, MT 59460$2,423,435
18W-five RanchFort Benton, MT 59442$2,422,374
19Rolling Acres Farm IncBrady, MT 59416$2,399,928
20Stockman Bank **Conrad, MT 59425$2,374,662

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag