Market Loss Assistance Program in Chouteau County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,497
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Chouteau County, Montana totaled $45,460,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dnrc Trust Land Management - Exem | Helena, MT 59620 | $670,724 |
2 | Williams Brothers | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $287,648 |
3 | Cgw Farms | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $262,620 |
4 | Worrall Brothers Farm Partnership | Loma, MT 59460 | $261,168 |
5 | Drylander Farming | Brady, MT 59416 | $246,000 |
6 | Krd Farms | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $235,118 |
7 | K & E Brothers | Loma, MT 59460 | $220,256 |
8 | Robert C & Kenneth C Yirsa | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $212,055 |
9 | Birkeland Bros | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $205,600 |
10 | Spring Coulee Land & Cattle | Highwood, MT 59450 | $201,902 |
11 | B & M Lund | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $196,846 |
12 | Schuler Bros | Carter, MT 59420 | $192,430 |
13 | Malek Farms Partnership | Highwood, MT 59450 | $186,800 |
14 | Shonkin Creek Livestock | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $185,486 |
15 | Eagle Butte Farm Partnership | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $179,620 |
16 | Kidd Brothers | Bigfork, MT 59911 | $177,172 |
17 | Anderson Partnership | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $170,139 |
18 | Andreasen Lenington Partnership | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $164,920 |
19 | T & M Farming | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $160,000 |
20 | Engellant Ranch Partnership | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $159,272 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>