Counter Cyclical Program in Golden Valley County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 139
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Golden Valley County, Montana totaled $125,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Locomotive Butte Farm Inc | Ryegate, MT 59074 | $19,067 |
2 | Golden Valley Colony Inc | Ryegate, MT 59074 | $18,401 |
3 | Dennis Mcdonald | Melville, MT 59055 | $7,626 |
4 | Zinne Land & Cattle Inc | Ryegate, MT 59074 | $5,529 |
5 | Cremer Ranch | Melville, MT 59055 | $5,076 |
6 | Lehfeldt Rambouillets | Lavina, MT 59046 | $4,652 |
7 | Reuben Pitsch | Ryegate, MT 59074 | $3,437 |
8 | Horpestad Ranch Inc | Lavina, MT 59046 | $3,141 |
9 | Quarter Circle Bell Inc | Lavina, MT 59046 | $2,723 |
10 | William C Ramage | Ryegate, MT 59074 | $2,600 |
11 | Kelly Ramage | Billings, MT 59102 | $2,557 |
12 | Walking 5 Ranch Llp | Broadview, MT 59015 | $2,511 |
13 | Leo Schraudner Ranch Partnership | Boise, ID 83713 | $2,110 |
14 | Daum Family Trust - Ronald Daum | Lavina, MT 59046 | $2,104 |
15 | Schaff Farms Inc | Lavina, MT 59046 | $1,950 |
16 | Calvin D Christensen | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,891 |
17 | Materials Bio Inc Dba Quad Five | Ryegate, MT 59074 | $1,855 |
18 | Elmo Von Olnhausen | Shawmut, MT 59078 | $1,737 |
19 | Sargent Ranches Inc | Shawmut, MT 59078 | $1,709 |
20 | Glenn R Berg | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,540 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>