Counter Cyclical Program in Hill County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,076
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Hill County, Montana totaled $1,142,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dnrc Trust Land Management - Exem | Helena, MT 59620 | $14,970 |
| 2 | East End Colony Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $14,440 |
| 3 | Hilldale Colony Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $14,338 |
| 4 | Dry Land Farms Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $13,382 |
| 5 | Baltrusch Land & Cattle Co | Havre, MT 59501 | $12,634 |
| 6 | D D & J Farms | Kremlin, MT 59532 | $12,116 |
| 7 | S W & Crew | Havre, MT 59501 | $11,518 |
| 8 | Wolery Farms Inc | Inverness, MT 59530 | $9,580 |
| 9 | Johnson Farms | Kremlin, MT 59532 | $9,390 |
| 10 | Willow Creek Ranch Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $9,078 |
| 11 | Red Rock Farms Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $8,657 |
| 12 | Dcm Inc | Box Elder, MT 59521 | $8,182 |
| 13 | Kaercher Grain Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $8,059 |
| 14 | Jsks Pattison Ptnrshp | Havre, MT 59501 | $8,044 |
| 15 | Grass Farms Inc | Box Elder, MT 59521 | $7,614 |
| 16 | Triple K Partnership | Gildford, MT 59525 | $7,604 |
| 17 | Sandy Rock Farms Inc | Gildford, MT 59525 | $7,501 |
| 18 | Rambo Grain & Cattle Co | Gildford, MT 59525 | $7,156 |
| 19 | L M D Corporation | Gildford, MT 59525 | $7,155 |
| 20 | Roger Sherer | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $7,153 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf