Farm Subsidy information
Jefferson County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Jefferson County, Montana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 41
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Jefferson County, Montana totaled $327,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dalressa Farms Ptn | Three Forks, MT 59752 | $34,914 |
| 2 | Terry L Murphy | Cardwell, MT 59721 | $16,225 |
| 3 | Dunn Canyon Cattle Co | Boulder, MT 59632 | $13,463 |
| 4 | Simon Ranch Lp | Cardwell, MT 59721 | $12,167 |
| 5 | Jeff R Price | Three Forks, MT 59752 | $10,214 |
| 6 | Ann K Price | Three Forks, MT 59752 | $10,214 |
| 7 | Lynwood Stephen Bateman | Whitehall, MT 59759 | $10,211 |
| 8 | Daryn Cederberg Dba C Lazy A Livestock | Three Forks, MT 59752 | $9,977 |
| 9 | Patritti Cattle LLC | Whitehall, MT 59759 | $8,081 |
| 10 | Rieder Ranch Inc | Boulder, MT 59632 | $7,105 |
| 11 | John Perigo | Whitehall, MT 59759 | $3,983 |
| 12 | Gordon Williams | Three Forks, MT 59752 | $3,628 |
| 13 | Holt And Baker Ranches | Whitehall, MT 59759 | $3,463 |
| 14 | Jerry Ward | Whitehall, MT 59759 | $3,108 |
| 15 | L R Huckaba Ranch Inc | Cardwell, MT 59721 | $2,892 |
| 16 | Nolan J Murphy | Cardwell, MT 59721 | $2,718 |
| 17 | Devils Fence Ranch LLC | Boulder, MT 59632 | $2,665 |
| 18 | Paul T Smith Ranches Inc | Boulder, MT 59632 | $2,628 |
| 19 | Katherine D Cederberg | Three Forks, MT 59752 | $2,429 |
| 20 | Bernard T Jones | Three Forks, MT 59752 | $2,349 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf