Production Flexibility Program in Meagher County, Montana, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 63

Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Meagher County, Montana totaled $2,887,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Production Flexibility Program
1995-2021
1Springdale ColonyWht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645$305,402
2Ben R GaltWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$304,499
3Bonnie J LowerWillow Creek, MT 59760$298,256
4Brewer RanchRingling, MT 59642$244,864
5Camas Creek Cattle & Sheep CoWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$140,847
6David BrewerRingling, MT 59642$129,758
7Rostad & Rostad, IncBozeman, MT 59715$126,504
8Holmstrom Land Co IncWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$121,310
9Townsend Brothers LLCWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$106,105
10Gary WelchTownsend, MT 59644$95,146
11Sixteen Mile Creek Ranch LimitedLivingston, MT 59047$94,340
12Townsend Ranch IncWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$91,492
13Rosemarie BrewerRingling, MT 59642$75,630
14Jackson RanchesWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$65,138
15Wallace L BaileyWht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645$56,165
16Hussey Creek Ranch PartnershipWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$53,931
17Higgins BrosRingling, MT 59642$51,640
18Lucas Ranch IncRingling, MT 59642$46,095
19Riverside Ranch CoWhite Sulphur Spring, MT 59645$43,579
20Barry R HedrichWht Sphr Spgs, MT 59645$33,228

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag