Farm Subsidy information
Missoula County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Missoula County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 334
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Missoula County, Montana totaled $4,972,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rod & Tom Vannoy Ranch Co | Greenough, MT 59823 | $411,923 |
| 2 | Robert A Petersen | Missoula, MT 59808 | $332,526 |
| 3 | William J Lucier Jr | Missoula, MT 59808 | $212,822 |
| 4 | James Valeo | Missoula, MT 59808 | $160,807 |
| 5 | Dick Lucier | Frenchtown, MT 59834 | $143,067 |
| 6 | Joseph W Boyer Jr | Frenchtown, MT 59834 | $139,500 |
| 7 | Alfred Deschamps Jr | Frenchtown, MT 59834 | $130,851 |
| 8 | Richard E Richardson | Lolo, MT 59847 | $121,437 |
| 9 | Pruyn Ranch | Missoula, MT 59801 | $108,766 |
| 10 | Tony Staber | Unknown, MT 11111 | $107,052 |
| 11 | Monroe Cattle Company LLC | Missoula, MT 59802 | $99,615 |
| 12 | Betty D Bidlake | Missoula, MT 59808 | $94,604 |
| 13 | Paul Allen Hanson | Missoula, MT 59808 | $89,720 |
| 14 | Wills Cattle Co | Bonner, MT 59823 | $82,897 |
| 15 | Floyd Cheff | Missoula, MT 59804 | $77,183 |
| 16 | Anna Marie Hayes Harrison | Bonner, MT 59823 | $77,126 |
| 17 | Thomas R Scheffer | Huson, MT 59846 | $73,853 |
| 18 | Schroeder Bros Ranch | Florence, MT 59833 | $67,427 |
| 19 | Maclay And Son | Florence, MT 59833 | $64,697 |
| 20 | Dougherty Ranch Limited Partnersh | Missoula, MT 59808 | $58,089 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf