Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Rosebud County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 74
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Rosebud County, Montana totaled $1,632,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Glen Leonhardt And Carla Leonhardt | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $185,657 |
2 | Windancer Farms General Partnership | Miles City, MT 59301 | $141,104 |
3 | Hein Cattle Company | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $89,202 |
4 | Hammond Valley Colony Inc | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $82,695 |
5 | Warren C Venable | Miles City, MT 59301 | $81,902 |
6 | Perry Murnion | Jordan, MT 59337 | $77,057 |
7 | Elizabeth M Murnion | Jordan, MT 59337 | $77,057 |
8 | Xl Land & Livestock Inc | Miles City, MT 59301 | $66,210 |
9 | Larsen Ranch | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $60,502 |
10 | Paul-neiman Family R Neiman | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $57,012 |
11 | Martin Reierson | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $55,246 |
12 | Hathaway Ranch Corp | Hathaway, MT 59333 | $45,364 |
13 | Asay Farms Partnership | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $38,841 |
14 | Montgomery Ranch Co | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $37,557 |
15 | Paul J Hofer | Sumatra, MT 59083 | $37,058 |
16 | Erik Carl Peterson | Miles City, MT 59301 | $31,177 |
17 | Calvin Thornberg | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $30,974 |
18 | Cole Michael Hirsch | Miles City, MT 59301 | $28,350 |
19 | Seth Murnion | Jordan, MT 59337 | $27,982 |
20 | Xr Land And Livestock LLC | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $23,771 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>