Emergency Conservation Program in Stillwater County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 172
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Stillwater County, Montana totaled $835,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Steven G Ott | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $50,093 |
2 | J O Miller | Absarokee, MT 59001 | $38,406 |
3 | Peterson Ranch Co | Columbus, MT 59019 | $26,049 |
4 | Upper Keyser Creek Ranch Co | Columbus, MT 59019 | $23,754 |
5 | Katherine Mckeith | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $23,129 |
6 | Svenson Bros Ptnshp | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $22,608 |
7 | M & E Ranch Inc | Rapelje, MT 59067 | $21,879 |
8 | Lakeview Land & Livestock Inc | Molt, MT 59057 | $17,521 |
9 | Arnold Green Meadow Ranch | Absarokee, MT 59001 | $16,168 |
10 | David Saunders | Columbus, MT 59019 | $15,845 |
11 | Richard Atkins | Columbus, MT 59019 | $15,590 |
12 | Dale J Schneidt | Molt, MT 59057 | $15,304 |
13 | Leuthold Valley Creek Rn Inc | Molt, MT 59057 | $14,642 |
14 | Kevin Kovanda | Columbus, MT 59019 | $14,188 |
15 | Valentine M Zindler | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $13,867 |
16 | David P Peterson | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $13,744 |
17 | Beaver View Ranch | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $12,850 |
18 | Bill R Linger | Molt, MT 59057 | $10,882 |
19 | Robert S Bradbrook | Rapelje, MT 59067 | $10,780 |
20 | Ray Guthrie Jr | Absarokee, MT 59001 | $10,165 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>