Counter Cyclical Program in Stillwater County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 375
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Stillwater County, Montana totaled $399,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Steven G Ott | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $5,309 |
| 22 | Bill Hanser Ranch | Broadview, MT 59015 | $5,114 |
| 23 | Richard M Swartz | Broadview, MT 59015 | $5,109 |
| 24 | Bradbrook Inc | Rapelje, MT 59067 | $4,549 |
| 25 | Martin Mohr | Park City, MT 59063 | $4,476 |
| 26 | Beaver View Ranch | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $4,361 |
| 27 | Bar Four F Ranch Inc | Broadview, MT 59015 | $4,086 |
| 28 | Dan Weschenfelder | Shepherd, MT 59079 | $3,944 |
| 29 | Arnold Ranch Inc | Broadview, MT 59015 | $3,610 |
| 30 | Lakeview Land & Livestock Inc | Molt, MT 59057 | $3,359 |
| 31 | Downs Enterprises | Molt, MT 59057 | $3,345 |
| 32 | Leuthold Prairie View Rn Inc | Billings, MT 59102 | $3,291 |
| 33 | Myron Gross | Park City, MT 59063 | $3,277 |
| 34 | Van Oosten Ranch Inc | Reed Point, MT 59069 | $3,275 |
| 35 | Richard L Hamilton | Park City, MT 59063 | $3,225 |
| 36 | Kenneth Lloyd Mosdal | Roundup, MT 59072 | $3,211 |
| 37 | Dnrc Trust Land Management - Exem | Helena, MT 59620 | $3,124 |
| 38 | Leland J Frank | Park City, MT 59063 | $2,872 |
| 39 | Rs Ranch LLC | Sheldon, SC 29941 | $2,843 |
| 40 | Karen L Schott | Broadview, MT 59015 | $2,742 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf