Total Commodity Programs in Sweet Grass County, Montana, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 400

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sweet Grass County, Montana totaled $9,836,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2021
1Cayuse Livestock CoBig Timber, MT 59011$1,371,578
2Yost Cattle Co LLCReed Point, MT 59069$406,310
3Bays Revocable Living TrustColumbus, MT 59019$309,643
4Kenneth H HansonShawmut, MT 59078$210,282
5John DecockMelville, MT 59055$196,757
6Tom KnollBig Timber, MT 59011$193,455
7Lc Cattle Company, LLCBig Timber, MT 59011$188,646
8Greg H LangfordBig Timber, MT 59011$163,370
9Hooks Ranch LLCBig Timber, MT 59011$158,482
10Thomas G AgnewBig Timber, MT 59011$153,911
11Green Cattle Co. LLCMelville, MT 59055$149,258
12Matthew L CarrocciaBig Timber, MT 59011$145,585
13Philip L SchumanBig Timber, MT 59011$142,692
14Kevin D HalversonBig Timber, MT 59011$130,927
15Cole T CuminBig Timber, MT 59011$126,651
16Jason SmithBig Timber, MT 59011$117,762
17Hobble Diamond Ranch, LLCBig Timber, MT 59011$115,721
18Glenn R BergBig Timber, MT 59011$112,736
19Lawrence AllestadBig Timber, MT 59011$105,347
20Cosgriff Cattle LLCBig Timber, MT 59011$100,107

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag