Loan Deficiency in Toole County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 676
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Toole County, Montana totaled $10,045,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Torgerson Farms Partnership | Ethridge, MT 59435 | $317,311 |
| 2 | Nagy Farms LLC | Sweetgrass, MT 59484 | $276,154 |
| 3 | Hillside Colony Inc | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $274,752 |
| 4 | Rimrock Colony Inc | Sunburst, MT 59482 | $264,688 |
| 5 | Bow & Arrow Ranch | Sunburst, MT 59482 | $202,657 |
| 6 | Camrose Colony Inc | Ledger, MT 59456 | $198,709 |
| 7 | Karag Inc | Billings, MT 59106 | $195,554 |
| 8 | H-b Farms | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $190,218 |
| 9 | West End Farm Inc | Sunburst, MT 59482 | $158,505 |
| 10 | Diamond R Partnership | Ledger, MT 59456 | $147,095 |
| 11 | Wallewein Grain & Cattle Inc | Sunburst, MT 59482 | $142,815 |
| 12 | Plenty Water Inc | Sunburst, MT 59482 | $129,086 |
| 13 | M & M Farms | Shelby, MT 59474 | $111,674 |
| 14 | Prairie Home Farms Inc | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $107,404 |
| 15 | Mccarter Farms Inc | Shelby, MT 59474 | $100,865 |
| 16 | Karo Farm Partnership | Ledger, MT 59456 | $98,278 |
| 17 | Flesch Grain And Livestock | Shelby, MT 59474 | $91,803 |
| 18 | Dunk Farms Inc | Sunburst, MT 59482 | $90,892 |
| 19 | Roger Horgus | Shelby, MT 59474 | $83,156 |
| 20 | Ernest Taft | Sunburst, MT 59482 | $80,728 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf