Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Toole County, Montana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 416
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Toole County, Montana totaled $3,100,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Diamond R Partnership | Ledger, MT 59456 | $33,268 |
22 | Eney Family Farms | Kalispell, MT 59904 | $32,578 |
23 | Flesch Grain And Livestock | Shelby, MT 59474 | $31,741 |
24 | Camrose Colony Inc | Ledger, MT 59456 | $31,249 |
25 | Northwest Farm Credit Service ** | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $30,710 |
26 | Mccarter Farms Inc | Shelby, MT 59474 | $30,665 |
27 | Simmes Ranch Inc | Sunburst, MT 59482 | $29,924 |
28 | Prairie Home Farms Inc | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $28,943 |
29 | Timber Coulee Farms | Loma, MT 59460 | $28,112 |
30 | Dept Of Natural Resources & Conservation Trust Lan | Helena, MT 59620 | $27,645 |
31 | Grinde Grain Inc | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $27,470 |
32 | Fretheim Brothers | Shelby, MT 59474 | $25,554 |
33 | Dry Teakettle Ranch Inc | Sunburst, MT 59482 | $25,364 |
34 | Kelleher Brothers | Shelby, MT 59474 | $25,034 |
35 | Triangle Company | Oilmont, MT 59466 | $22,539 |
36 | Sisk Ranch Inc | Galata, MT 59444 | $22,521 |
37 | John Horgus Inc | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $21,706 |
38 | Pacerosa Inc | Sunburst, MT 59482 | $21,680 |
39 | Suta Brothers | Sunburst, MT 59482 | $21,237 |
40 | Torgerson Farms Partnership | Ethridge, MT 59435 | $20,646 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”