Farm Subsidy information
Valley County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Valley County, Montana, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 696
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Valley County, Montana totaled $40,285,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Independence Bank ** | Havre, MT 59501 | $825,028 |
2 | Cody Cornwell Inc | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $770,701 |
3 | Cornwell Ranch | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $705,065 |
4 | First Community Bank ** | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $704,531 |
5 | Page Whitham Land & Cattle Llp | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $659,281 |
6 | Neufeld Farms Partnership | Larslan, MT 59244 | $619,372 |
7 | Frenchman Valley Ranch Ptnrshp | Saco, MT 59261 | $533,123 |
8 | Northwest Farm Credit Service ** | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $437,244 |
9 | Jeffrey D Sather | Larslan, MT 59244 | $426,600 |
10 | Buggy Creek Livestock Lllp | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $385,126 |
11 | Kirkland Ranch LLC | Fort Peck, MT 59223 | $381,541 |
12 | Donald R Renner | Larslan, MT 59244 | $373,070 |
13 | Ydoc Land & Livestock LLC | Belgrade, MT 59714 | $346,062 |
14 | Albus Brothers Partnership | Hinsdale, MT 59241 | $344,333 |
15 | Robert J Winderl | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $331,885 |
16 | Mark & Steve Knaff Ptnrshp | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $304,328 |
17 | Brandon P Reddig | Lustre, MT 59225 | $300,569 |
18 | Kevin Nelson | Richland, MT 59260 | $282,292 |
19 | Kummerfeldt Farms LLC | Nashua, MT 59248 | $278,582 |
20 | Nielsen Farms | Nashua, MT 59248 | $266,048 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>