Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Nebraska, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,481
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Nebraska totaled $8,765,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | John R Keifer | Guide Rock, NE 68942 | $42,792 |
2 | Diamond Bar Ranch Co | Stapleton, NE 69163 | $39,535 |
3 | Hobbs Farms | Ewing, NE 68735 | $31,239 |
4 | Ohlman Brothers Partnership | Wood River, NE 68883 | $28,649 |
5 | Thomas Joseph Smaus | David City, NE 68632 | $27,519 |
6 | Quarter Circle S Ranch | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $27,404 |
7 | Sears Brothers | Ainsworth, NE 69210 | $24,553 |
8 | Dck Partnership | Ainsworth, NE 69210 | $24,282 |
9 | Kenneth Marlatt | Wood Lake, NE 69221 | $23,993 |
10 | L A H Eickhoff Farms Inc | Falls City, NE 68355 | $23,208 |
11 | Schmidt Ag Inc | Fairbury, NE 68352 | $22,500 |
12 | Glen Bruns & Son Inc | Chappell, NE 69129 | $21,940 |
13 | Scott G Ansley | Harrisburg, NE 69345 | $21,377 |
14 | Gene Otis Timperley | Lynch, NE 68746 | $20,966 |
15 | Richard L Zeisler | Butte, NE 68722 | $20,808 |
16 | Studebaker Enterprises Inc | Raymond, NE 68428 | $19,956 |
17 | Brown Family Farms Inc | Wood River, NE 68883 | $19,389 |
18 | Quinto Ranch LLC | Edgemont, SD 57735 | $17,500 |
19 | Dale Anderson | Chadron, NE 69337 | $17,377 |
20 | Coyle Farms Inc | Mc Cook, NE 69001 | $17,081 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>