Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in Nebraska, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 5,067
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in Nebraska totaled $47,650,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $556,917 |
2 | Dose Land & Cattle | Hampton, NE 68843 | $318,188 |
3 | Twin County Feeders LLC | Minatare, NE 69356 | $308,110 |
4 | Steven Dent | Mullen, NE 69152 | $224,720 |
5 | V Hansen Land & Cattle Co | Herman, NE 68029 | $210,913 |
6 | Double T Livestock | Adams, NE 68301 | $177,925 |
7 | Don V Cain Jr | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $170,450 |
8 | Todd A Boettcher | Spencer, NE 68777 | $158,197 |
9 | Art Dose & Son Inc | Hampton, NE 68843 | $157,430 |
10 | Schultz Farms & Ranches Inc | Columbus, NE 68601 | $152,753 |
11 | Christensen Cattle Co Inc | Fullerton, NE 68638 | $144,910 |
12 | Dallas Roy Christensen | Edison, NE 68936 | $143,524 |
13 | Charles E Dickau | Brewster, NE 68821 | $142,948 |
14 | Hayes Feed Yard Inc | Silver Creek, NE 68663 | $139,101 |
15 | Lehr Inc | Columbus, NE 68601 | $138,420 |
16 | T & E Cattle Co | Grand Island, NE 68803 | $135,275 |
17 | Stephen P Krajicek | Lincoln, NE 68510 | $133,869 |
18 | Herman Dinklage Inc | Wisner, NE 68791 | $130,055 |
19 | Barry Renz | Deshler, NE 68340 | $125,330 |
20 | Faessler Farms Ltd | Bridgeport, NE 69336 | $125,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>