Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Nebraska, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 52,419

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Nebraska totaled $1,950,000,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2021
1Niewohner Farming EnterpriseAlbion, NE 68620$2,219,563
2Kaliff FarmsYork, NE 68467$2,089,187
3Sandahl FarmsWakefield, NE 68784$2,001,466
4Tri-s AgMerna, NE 68856$1,705,226
5H R W Farm PartnershipFriend, NE 68359$1,637,620
6Marsh FarmsHartington, NE 68739$1,503,628
7Merna Valley AgMerna, NE 68856$1,334,536
8Danielski Harvesting & FarmingValentine, NE 69201$1,327,604
9Sundog PartnershipHoldrege, NE 68949$1,173,655
10Scheinost FarmsPage, NE 68766$1,121,255
11Murdoch PartnershipOrleans, NE 68966$1,068,539
12Aden Diversified Ag PartnershipGothenburg, NE 69138$1,045,917
13Stromberger & Sons PartnershipImperial, NE 69033$1,038,124
14Andersen Family FarmsDakota City, NE 68731$992,264
15Schiff PartnershipHarrington, DE 19952$981,811
16Taylor Farms General PartnershipAmes, NE 68621$972,356
17C J Farms Gen PtnrHoldrege, NE 68949$962,221
18Orville Hoffschneider & SonsWaco, NE 68460$954,663
19J D Hirschfeld & SonsBenedict, NE 68316$943,862
20Niobrara FarmsAtkinson, NE 68713$923,701

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag